Is it fine to used evidence as verb? Enclosures (3) it's assumed the recipient will have the ability to differentiate. At hand seems to me as if you have something in reach.
If not, what other better word can be used in the place of evidence as a verb? The earliest match for the gente in dios etymology that a google books search turns up is from. In this instance, evidenced by.
And in hand can be used as if you have. The word is not hypothesis as i'm not describing the scienti. I'm looking for a word that describes something that is not yet a scientifically proven fact, but people intuitively think to be true. This was previously addressed in the question, is 'evidence' countable? you could talk about more evidence or further evidence to avoid the wordier (but just as correct) another piece of evidence.
The answer that your comment links to (which was posted in 2011) does indeed say that leaving the phrase open is an option—and the question poster accepted that answer. Formally, you would refer to the enclosed items in the body of your letter followed by (enclosed) and then, under the signature at the end of the letter you'd write enclosures (x) where x is the number of enclosures. I find evidence can be used as a ve. [often with verbal noun] indicating the means of achieving something:
What's the difference between at hand, on hand and in hand? See the second definition of by, from oxford dictionaries: 4 bottles of wine, and so on. We can't touch 'evidence' but 'types of evidence' such as hair samples, photographs, documents are countable.
On hand is if you have something in stock. A documentary history reports 90 instances of the word gente and 50 instances of the word dios, but 0 instances of the phrase gente in dios. The containers are countable but not the contents.the ' weights of evidence' would be wrong because 'evidence' is an abstract concept. 'malaria can be controlled by attacking the parasite' when combined with the definition of evidenced, also from oxford dictionaries:
In probabilistic terms, evidence increases the probability that a proposition holds, relative to its value without such evidence, whereas proof raises the probability to certainty.