The malong spouses prayed that the pnr be ordered to pay them damages totalling p136,370. 1) the malong spouses filed a complaint against the philippine national railways (pnr) after their son died falling from an overloaded pnr train. Upon a motion by the solicitor general, the trial court dismissed the complaint, citing lack of jurisdiction based on the argument that pnr, being a government instrumentality,.
The malong spouses alleged in their complaint that on october 30, 1977 their son, jaime aquino, a paying passenger, was killed when he fell from a pnr train while it was between tarlac and. The trial court dismissed the. Upon a motion by the solicitor general, the trial court dismissed the complaint, citing lack of.
The malong spouses alleged in their complaint that on october 30, 1977 their son, jaime aquino, a paying passenger, was killed when he fell from a pnr train while it was between tarlac and. The malong spouses alleged in their complaint that on october 30, 1977 their son, jaime aquino, a paying passenger, was killed when he fell from a pnr train while it was between tarlac and. Upon the solicitor general's motion, the trial court dismissed the complaint. The petitioners filed a complaint against the philippine national railways (pnr) after their son was killed when he fell from an overloaded pnr train.
It ruled that it had. The trial court dismissed the case,. But the restrictive interpretation laid down therein is of no practical worth nor can it give rise to herein petitioner pnr's exoneration since the case of malong vs. The malong spouses filed a lawsuit against pnr seeking damages amounting to php 136,370.