On hand is if you have something in stock. Evidenced be or show evidence of: This was previously addressed in the question, is 'evidence' countable? you could talk about more evidence or further evidence to avoid the wordier (but just as correct) another piece of evidence.
The containers are countable but not the contents.the ' weights of evidence' would be wrong because 'evidence' is an abstract concept. At hand seems to me as if you have something in reach. A hathi trust search of the bilingual (spanish/english) edition of the cecil jane translation of the four voyages of columbus:
And in hand can be used as if you have. In this instance, evidenced by. A documentary history reports 90 instances of the word gente and 50 instances of the word dios, but 0 instances of the phrase gente in dios. If not, what other better word can be used in the place of evidence as a verb?
The answer that your comment links to (which was posted in 2011) does indeed say that leaving the phrase open is an option—and the question poster accepted that answer. Two cans of coffee, 3 loaves of bread. I'm looking for a word that describes something that is not yet a scientifically proven fact, but people intuitively think to be true. The word is not hypothesis as i'm not describing the scienti.
In probabilistic terms, evidence increases the probability that a proposition holds, relative to its value without such evidence, whereas proof raises the probability to certainty. The earliest match for the gente in dios etymology that a google books search turns up is from. 4 bottles of wine, and so on. [often with verbal noun] indicating the means of achieving something:
'malaria can be controlled by attacking the parasite' when combined with the definition of evidenced, also from oxford dictionaries: Enclosures (3) it's assumed the recipient will have the ability to differentiate. What's the difference between at hand, on hand and in hand? Is it fine to used evidence as verb?
I find evidence can be used as a ve.